What
I noticed the most about the narrative structures contained in the four short
videos titled, “Hill”, “Prime”, “Coffer”, and “Byun” from a series called This Must Be the Place, was that the
camera is able to show a contrast to what is being said. For example, Hill says
he lives in a shop and that he is never really alone, yet, the images the audience
is shown are displaying a different perspective—the perspective most of the
world sees when they look at run down images of a once immensely prosperous
city. Despite the isolation that appears on screen, Hill’s words are
consistently positive and hopeful.
In “Prime”, I was interested by the
blurring of the film during certain parts, especially toward the end. Maybe
this technique is a call back to earlier simpler times—this seems to be a theme
of these video shorts, though I’m concerned that they future only men (side
point).
I’m noticing that this type of
narrative makes it easier to be more concise and say more with shots in
addition to dialogue than they could do one at a time on the written page. The
close ups in “Prime” are powerful and makes me wonder if they are equally
effective on the page if not more. Another theme of these shorts is the
reliance on striking images with no words.
In “Coffer”, the contrast between
his dialogue and the images shown help lead the audience into the narrative,
though I think this can be done just as effectively on paper. This video had
the most action—Coffer making his plate photography. I think action could have been
used more and I didn’t appreciate the use of the same type of music for every
video.
Video is especially effective for
translation without leaving out the words which were actually said. I thought
that the story of “Byun” was the most compelling—the least ordinary among a
group of ‘different’ people. These pieces definitely have some great discussion
material embedded in them—great pick!
Elaine,
ReplyDeleteI did not notice that all these pieces were men. I'm interested in the process which these films undergo including the selection process. I wonder how Lost and Found films decide which sites and characters to profile.
I found your statement, "...the same type of music for every video." I think that the music was vastly different for every movie and even topic sections within the movies. I, however, did recognize their was an aura that was in every film, somehow related to music. I resolved this by writing in my response that the pacing for a four movies was slow due to slow music. But I'm not even sure if you can call all of the movies slow. I'm a little stumped.
On reflection, I also wonder if you would call Lost and Found Films documentary artist or journalists. Their work seems to lean the same way radiolab does, focusing more on the ascetic and overall feeling than content and validity.
Hi Elaine,
ReplyDeleteI'm interested in your observation that the directors only focus on men during their filming. It got me thinking about the reverse problem that we discussed in terms of reporting on very different people like LeBlanc. Instead of reporting on people very different from us, is it equally problematic to report upon people whose identities mirror our own?
Elaine E